what exactly is this "micro-stamping"..????
even though you (or even i) do not have any little ones around the house, i have read, but cannot prove, that the locks can sometimes be very difficult, in that they can (at times) suddenly lock you out while you are shooting the gun. (maybe from too much vibration???)
i am trying to recall, i think it was on the S&W revolver site, that the issue happens (at times). it was recommended that a person frequently inserts the key and ensures the lock is in the open position.
i just tried the search feature at the other site, i cannot come up with the trigger lock issues.
(and it may have only been a revolver problem)
maybe someone here can help out and explain the issue, if someone here has a few revolvers with that trigger lock.
i just found it easy to swap out the MSH...however, on an Emissary, from that searching i have done, there isn't an exact looking MSH yet available for the Emissary.
Unless I misremember, microstamping is the term for a functionally nonexistent technology which will imprint a unique identifier onto the primer of every round fired from a particular gun. Somehow, I also seem to remember that it can be done on the casing as well.
I believe the "technology" can be circumvented by a couple of means, which I won't detail. (Most of you can reason that out for yourself).
The challenge for the proponents of this absurdity should be to prove
how this will impact "gun violence", but as with almost every other anti-gun law we are forced to
prove that it won't. The presumptive position is that it's more "common sense" and only evil people would oppose it.
So, in a true legal proceeding what would microstamping give to offer into evidence? The only fact that could be concluded is that a casing from a particular gun was found at a crime scene. It doesn't offer conclusive evidence that said gun was used in the crime. It doesn't even prove that gun was ever fired at that location.
What is does give the state is a "probable cause" to obtain a search warrant for the owner of that gun. Likely that would be the original purchaser, or last recorded purchaser. Under the pretense of an ongoing criminal investigation, they will then search and seize all firearms owned by that individual. At best, that person will be facing a long, expensive legal battle to reclaim their illegally seized property.
Should that person eventually win their suit, the state will have created a reason to have destroyed their property. That person may find themselves being prosecuted for having "unapproved" firearms as defined under the new laws (why would you expect them to grandfather old guns in?).
In short, microstamping is a Pandora's Box when it comes to second amendment rights. If enacted, it will do far more than simply make it impossible for manufacturers to sell guns. It's a back door way to confiscate all guns without Constitutional protections. It's a tool of the fascists on the left to expedite their goal of the disassembly of our republic and replace it with a Marxist "utopia".