My Hemi will do well over 65mph and often does as do many others in my state. The thing is, if I get pulled over at 120mph, I am more than likely going to be arrested. If I had a permit allowing me to drive 120mph, therefore keeping me from being placed under arrest, why would I not get the permit?
* We * probably would regardless . But for the " Less dedicated * there are several positive and negative factors :
Cost ( & related hassle and time sink ) .
In my turf , it's about $ 500 all together, plus 2 or 2.5 days out of your life . Plus hours screaming at balky out of date computers.
For people anticipating only occasional carry ( for whatever reason ) , that's real money , and a hassle if they have a busy or unpredictable schedule . Enough to make them stop and think . Then think again .
In their jurisdiction, most of the places they regularly are for job or whatever are Prohibited areas with teeth . See above about balancing $ vs only occasionally making use .
Or flip side - How much Freedom you already have without a Permit .
Things there have evolved since then . But the situation in one particular state, in particular Era stuck in my mind as an example .
W/o Permit was explicitly legal to carry loaded in glovebox , and Open Carry was legal , and generally no hassle . For large % of public , that was " close enough " .
And nowadays, more than half the States are some flavor of Con Carry . If they don't live in proximity to state line, or otherwise regularly go to other state that threads the narrow window of Pro Gun enough to have Reciprocity, but not Pro Gun enough to be Con Carry , big % of public would think twice about spending money , time, and hassle for a Permit only for Reciprocity, once or twice a year.