Is it time for national carry?

[Jfal]

omg

 

[Lo-Profile]

Unless they rule completely constitutional carry in all 50 states without stipulations. I for one adamantly do not want the Federal god'vernment regulating my rights to protect myself in any way. They will add way to many litmus tests, rules and expenses making it a much harder burden for the citizens to comply with.

 

[Skunkhouse]

Agreed, whole heartily

 

[Bassbob]

^^^^^^^

This.

 

[bc22wm]

Unless they rule completely constitutional carry in all 50 states without stipulations. I for one adamantly do not want the Federal god'vernment regulating my rights to protect myself in any way. They will add way to many litmus tests, rules and expenses making it a much harder burden for the citizens to comply with.

Just so it can be read again.

 

[PAGunGuy]

Unless they rule completely constitutional carry in all 50 states without stipulations. I for one adamantly do not want the Federal god'vernment regulating my rights to protect myself in any way. They will add way to many litmus tests, rules and expenses making it a much harder burden for the citizens to comply with.

Nope, all they have to do is make it mandatoraly reciprical. Full stop.
Just like they did with same sex marriage. That's it.
Every state MUST recognize what is legal in the other states.

 

[trader]

Admirable sentiment PA and while we all agree, that is not what they would do. They always overcomplicate things wtih pages of new regulations. So what they should do is never what they do, do. lol

 

[Lo-Profile]

Nope, all they have to do is make it mandatoraly reciprical. Full stop.
Just like they did with same sex marriage. That's it.
Every state MUST recognize what is legal in the other states.

No way they'll do that, doesn't regenerate enough revenue.

What about States that are now Constitutional Carry, they would have to have a new CCW law.

How many restrictive States would ignore it like the Federal laws for traveling with guns already.

 

[Lo-Profile]

Just so it can be read again.
View attachment 69711

Don't forget, Reagan is responsible for the beginning of California's current outrageous gun laws.

 

[Talyn]

https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment2.html#:~:text=The%20Court%20then%20analyzed%20the,a%20particular%20purpose%20%E2%80%94%20confrontation.%22

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/URLs_Cited/OT2007/07-290/07-290.pdf

Legal Corpus Linguistics and the Meaning of “Bear Arms” | Duke Center for Firearms Law

firearmslaw.duke.edu

 

[PAGunGuy]

Admirable sentiment PA and while we all agree, that is not what they would do. They always overcomplicate things wtih pages of new regulations. So what they should do is never what they do, do. lol

I think my idea is 100% feasible.

No way they'll do that, doesn't regenerate enough revenue.

What about States that are now Constitutional Carry, they would have to have a new CCW law.

How many restrictive States would ignore it like the Federal laws for traveling with guns already.

What revenue is lost?
I think all Constitutional Carry States still have a law that allows for a permit

 

[Tinyman]

As a sideline, they should look at WHERE a firearm can be carried legally. If I drive by a school on the way to work, I'm within XXX feet -- am I guilty of "within" limits? Why can't I carry when I buy a roll of stamps at the Post Office?

I realize nothing will come of it, but I can hope.

 

[Scottish Warrior]

Given the election results, it seems to me that now is the time for the returning POTUS to push for legislation that allows for national constitutional carry - concealed or open. What do you think?

ABSOLUTELY, It's unconstitutional to have to pay for a permit. Especially when background checks are run to purchase a gun.