testtest

POTUS 46 News Conference

LOL! Yes, and the only verification of that was Trump himself.
False. Doctor Ronny Jackson, the same doctor who did it the first time when the democrats had the balls to "Demand" it has repeated the same claim. As I recall they were actually bandying about the idea of 25th amendmenting him. Funny how no democrats thought Joe should take one, even though for at least 3 years everyone with a brain knew he was, eh, compromised. Now they all act surprised. They're not upset that Biden is out of it, they're upset it's no longer possible to hide it. Funny they aren't talking about 25th amendmenting him either. The blatant hypocrisy is astounding.
 
False. Doctor Ronny Jackson, the same doctor who did it the first time when the democrats had the balls to "Demand" it has repeated the same claim. As I recall they were actually bandying about the idea of 25th amendmenting him. Funny how no democrats thought Joe should take one, even though for at least 3 years everyone with a brain knew he was, eh, compromised. Now they all act surprised. They're not upset that Biden is out of it, they're upset it's no longer possible to hide it. Funny they aren't talking about 25th amendmenting him either. The blatant hypocrisy is astounding.

I stand corrected but, Ronny Jackson, the Republican Congressman from Texas. That's a verification we can all believe.
 
I stand corrected but, Ronny Jackson, the Republican Congressman from Texas. That's a verification we can all believe.
He was Obama’s White House physician and a decorated veteran. There’s zero reason to believe he would risk his career and medical license by lying.

And other than your disagreeing with every single thing Trump says or stands for, can you cite a single legitimate reason his cognitive abilities should be questioned ? Because the world can give hundreds of reasons Biden’s should be.
 
I stand corrected but, Ronny Jackson, the Republican Congressman from Texas. That's a verification we can all believe.
Furthermore, your implication that Jackson being a republican congressman means his word isn't objective indicates one of two things.

A) You concede that the claims that Bidenomics is fixing the economy, Biden is the most accomplished president in modern history, republicans and Trump are a threat to democracy, Jan 6 was an insurrection, all of which are democrat talking points and extremely present in every stump speech and the majority of MSM punditry reports, is all less than objective.

B) You are biased.
 
Furthermore, your implication that Jackson being a republican congressman means his word isn't objective indicates one of two things.

A) You concede that the claims that Bidenomics is fixing the economy, Biden is the most accomplished president in modern history, republicans and Trump are a threat to democracy, Jan 6 was an insurrection, all of which are democrat talking points and extremely present in every stump speech and the majority of MSM punditry reports, is all less than objective.

B) You are biased.
Wow, you stretched my statement to the point of silliness.

A. Couldn't be further from the truth.

B. Absolutely true. I've hated Trump from the day he ridiculed John McCain's military service and the 5 and a half years he was a POW and to top that off Trump was a draft dodger. As a Vietnam veteran I will never vote for Trump, NEVER!!!
 
Wow, you stretched my statement to the point of silliness.

A. Couldn't be further from the truth.

B. Absolutely true. I've hated Trump from the day he ridiculed John McCain's military service and the 5 and a half years he was a POW and to top that off Trump was a draft dodger. As a Vietnam veteran I will never vote for Trump, NEVER!!!
I respect McCain for his service, but i cannot stand that man. He was a RINO
 
I will never vote for Trump, NEVER!!!
Okay. Your prerogative. However, your reasoning, if it is indeed reasoning, is no different than some snowflake casting a vote for someone because they think they're cute. No difference. Donald Trump, as a person, I find largely detestable. My prerogative is to support the platform, not who's standing upon it.
 
The current Presidency explained:
IMG_7032.gif
 
Okay. Your prerogative. However, your reasoning, if it is indeed reasoning, is no different than some snowflake casting a vote for someone because they think they're cute. No difference. Donald Trump, as a person, I find largely detestable. My prerogative is to support the platform, not who's standing upon it.

No, my reasoning is I will never vote for a man to be Commander-in-Chief of the military who not only ridiculed a war hero who suffered a permanent injury, but also disparaged the American war dead in France. If that makes me a snowflake, then I'm proud to be a snowflake.
 
Actually mental acuity peaks at middle age and then slowly declines, so yes, age is a factor. I'd be willing to bet that both candidates would do poorly on a cognitive test.
Generally yes, but...

Actually...Mental acuity comprises a person's ability to reason, focus, and recall information at optimum speeds. Losing mental acuity, or sharpness of the mind, is often referred to as cognitive decline — the key mental change associated with Alzheimer's, dementia, Parkinson's, and other brain and age-related disorders.

Studies and empirical data show that, on average, an individual adult’s cognitive acuity deteriorates with age. Notably, numerous factors like lifestyle and diet, fitness and general health can contribute to fluctuations, changes and declines in cognitive acuity.

There are various factors that affect mental acuity.


In general, there are older folks that are still sharp and fully functional, whereas others decline earlier. There is no measurable time when the latter occurs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top