That's interesting to know Talyn, ThanksShooting a revolver is way different than a pistol especially a striker fired one.
Pythons have a point in the trigger return that appears to be a reset but isn't because of the geometry. If you don't let it go to its real reset you can lock things up.
That's interesting to know Talyn, Thanks
That's interesting, thanks for the link TalynCheck this vid
Shooting the New Python with Ken Hackathorn
at:
13:04
&
13:45
I suspect that the reviews where there were problems is because the shooters aren't familiar with how Pythons work.
Well here’s your chance SMSgtRod. It’s almost like Colt was thinking about you when they decided to reintroduce the Python. “We got to get this gun to SMSgtRod!”. And it’s 1/2 the price I paid for my used Python.Sold many in my day, never could quite swing one for myself....
Yeah but, is it like movie sequel? When something comes back I'm so leery, it's not the real thing.Well here’s your chance SMSgtRod. It’s almost like Colt was thinking about you when they decided to reintroduce the Python. “We got to get this gun to SMSgtRod!”. And it’s 1/2 the price I paid for my used Python.
Well, some of the reviews seem to think it’s better. I just take them as 2 separate entities like my reproduction Auto Ordinance M1 Carbine and my 1942 Saginaw M1 Carbine. One to shoot frequently the other a few times and keep as the investment.Yeah but, is it like movie sequel? When something comes back I'm so leery, it's not the real thing.
Dimensionally is it exact????
Loved the Colt Cobra I had....
For me the old timer would be the one to shoot. History is great.....Well, some of the reviews seem to think it’s better. I just take them as 2 separate entities like my reproduction Auto Ordinance M1 Carbine and my 1942 Saginaw M1 Carbine. One to shoot frequently the other a few times and keep as the investment.
It is a nice shooting piece, I’ll attest to that. I’m going to wait awhile (ensure no bugs), before probably purchasing the new one.For me the old timer would be the one to shoot. History is great.....
We'll see what the price runs.... I'm looking at another SA 1911.....It is a nice shooting piece, I’ll attest to that. I’m going to wait awhile (ensure no bugs), before probably purchasing the new one.
MSRP is $1600 & some are getting charged more. They should come down to that price with increased inventory & hopefully less than that as it agesWe'll see what the price runs.... I'm looking at another SA 1911.....
Check this vid
Shooting the New Python with Ken Hackathorn
at:
13:04
&
13:45
I suspect that the reviews where there were problems is because the shooters aren't familiar with how Pythons work.
I saw the video and "pull trigger, no bang" concerned me (one at 30:42 of his video). Looks like the cylinder doesn't rotate on trigger pull thus "firing" on already shot cartridge. It's not the only video I saw or read about that this occurring. It's why I responded to SMSgtRod above, that I'll wait awhile before purchasing, so Colt can work out the problems. I was burnt twice with 4 Sig P320's (Voluntary Update Program AKA Drop fire recall), and 2 Ruger's Mark IV pistols with safety selector issues where it appeared on but you could still fire the pistol. Both companies customer service department's were fantastic, it was just a hassle sending them in and waiting for return. I don't want to go through that here, hence the wait.
So, your saying Hickok45 doesn’t know how to shoot a python.......lol.......ok
So, your saying Hickok45 doesn’t know how to shoot a python.......lol.......ok
Well, they may both be right. Hickok45 mentioned he had the issue before they started recording and I think he had the issue more than once in the video (I just hastily found one zooming towards the end). He has an old Python (so I'm guessing he familiar with shooting them, although I believe Colt did tweak the trigger mechanism in the new one). He mentions in the video that he like the new one a lot (in fact better than the original one he has), and plans on getting one eventually. As for me, I'm just going to wait and see. Perhaps you're correct with Ken Hackathorn's explanation and I'm curious if Colt will address the issue if more people report similar occurrences. I do appreciate your research and comments Talyn, the more input I (and others) have the better to make a wiser decision on purchase.Anyone can shoot a revolver but not all know how to shoot revolvers well, and different makes/models vary because the lock work varies (as Hackathorn stated) and he clearly pointed out how to run the Python trigger vs a S&W. Watch the vid at the times posted.
In the case of the Pythons' cylinders failing to advance, it's a case of function with the hand failing to rebound. The hand is connected to the trigger. So if someone is releasing the Python trigger short of its real reset, but at the "false" point the hand won't advance and the cylinder will not advance or lock up as Ken Hackathorn said it would because the Python lockwork is different than a S&W which has a rebound coil spring.
An analogy is short-stroking a pump shotgun. Is it a defect in the shotgun or human error when the shotgun fails to operate properly when short-stroked. Another is if a shooter rides the slide release on a 1911 when gripped and wonders why it won't lock back on empty.
Even Hickok45 still shot the Python fine after the stoppage happened. IMO, he, and others felt the false reset point (characteristic if the Python lockwork function) and short-stroked the trigger.
But, maybe there could be something in a run of Pythons that needs to be tweaked. I guess we'll see.
And I would easily say Ken Hackathorn has more experience that Hickok45 does.
My .02
Well, they may both be right. Hickok45 mentioned he had the issue before they started recording and I think he had the issue more than once in the video (I just hastily found one zooming towards the end). He has an old Python (so I'm guessing he familiar with shooting them, although I believe Colt did tweak the trigger mechanism in the new one). He mentions in the video that he like the new one a lot (in fact better than the original one he has), and plans on getting one eventually. As for me, I'm just going to wait and see. Perhaps you're correct with Ken Hackathorn's explanation and I'm curious if Colt will address the issue if more people report similar occurrences. I do appreciate your research and comments Talyn, the more input I (and others) have the better to make a wiser decision on purchase.