testtest

the moron's last days in office continue to fail amercan citizens

Joe didn't think of this on his own. This plan, complete with the 3 exclusions, was presented to him by the anti death penalty lobby and some powerful democrats.

I have a hard time seeing past the fact that people who are supposedly against state sanctioned execution lobbied for commutation for child raping serial killers, but specifically excluded those three. It's hard to make the case that child rape/murder is more deserving of mercy than racially motivated shootings. But then let's not pretend that Joe had an epiphany and did a complete 180 with regards to violent criminals from his " They should fry" days because of some moral change of opinion and not political expediency.

Not that it's in any way exclusive to Biden or democrats, but it is clear that citizens are regarded as chess pieces by politicians who have zero regrets about people dying to help their political careers. Which begs the question, if politicians are willing to kill people to further their careers it's not even possible to make the case that they are public servants. And THAT is what needs to change.
 
Chas said:
If Biden is diagnosed with a "mental" problem within months (weeks/days) of leaving office can his executive decisions be questioned/reversed ??
Click to expand...
JMO: When is the last time we so Joe signing any document live ?
Answer: It's been over a week. The dems made a big deal live on national television if he signed a document that he changed the breakfast menu in the white house. Other powerful people which must remain anonymous are pulling the strings.
Joe is headed for hospice. Stay tuned
 
Old_Me said:
funny, how when i said something much like that months ago, i was blasted by many for wanting to go the vigilante route on criminals and not respecting the constitutional rights of them.
Click to expand...
Well, if I'm being frank YOD is wrong too. Much like Biden('s handlers) pretending to take the moral high ground with commutations for most, it's pretty much impossible to make the case for your own constitutional rights while advocating for trampling on those of other people.
 
You will need a law professor to answer that,
youngolddude said:
Hang him, burn him, shoot him. Something to be said about vigilante justice.
Click to expand...
Yeah, what needs to be said about vigilante justice is that it is wrong. Who gets to decide where, when , who and how. We going to stone unmarried non virgins next? Where does it stop, sorry but even saying otherwise is wrong, and just anger talking.
 
Sld1959 said:
You will need a law professor to answer that,

Yeah, what needs to be said about vigilante justice is that it is wrong. Who gets to decide where, when , who and how. We going to stone unmarried non virgins next? Where does it stop, sorry but even saying otherwise is wrong, and just anger talking.
Click to expand...
Revolution, zombie apocalypse, end of the world, meh, I'm going to probably go down the road of destroying anything or anyone in my way. That aside, if it ain't trying to kill me, I most likely ain't going to try to kill it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top