Sig should be more diplomatic in their responses. Being called “the Dan Crenshaw of gun manufacturers” by the 2A gun community is a hard smear no manufacturer wants to be saddled with, especially when they have big gov contracts. I’m a Sig owner and love those guns. I own other makes and they’re cool too.
Maybe the market upheaval could elicit a conciliatory overture from Sig. Sig haters won’t be convinced but fence sitters and customers, could be negatively influenced simply by a caustic lawyer’s belligerent memo. They’re a huge company (bigger than HK?) and took care of my 1st Gen MCX w/o me asking for help. Good rifle. Smaller companies tend to be on top of QC but Sig reached out to me.
My P320 is 10mm, so I’m curious to know if it’s excluded from this issue. I’m hoping my armorer (if he knows Sigs) will shed some light.