If it had the 152mm HEAT round would have dealt a death blow. At Graf one year, there were three "new" M47 hulks down range for us to fire service HEAT. By the time we rolled off the range they were nothing but piles of metallic dust.The M551 never fired a shot in anger in Desert Storm/Shield. It's presence was more of a "fleet in being" that did not influence the fight. No Sheridan, anywhere, has ever fired upon a tank manned by an enemy. If it had, any kill would be the most reported and exalted tank battle since Michael Wittman.
One Iraqi M59 (Chinese-produced T-54) was reported destroyed, with the MGM-51 Shillelagh.If it had the 152mm HEAT round would have dealt a death blow. At Graf one year, there were three "new" M47 hulks down range for us to fire service HEAT. By the time we rolled off the range they were nothing but piles of metallic dust.
In the absence of any valid documentation I simply do not believe such a report. It would have been the most publicized tank kill since WWII, though it would have had no impact on the vehicle generally as they were being pulled from regular service by the '80's (apart from the 37th AR). I have some very extensive digitized files from the Patton Museum prior to BRAC. Nothing like that in there.One Iraqi M59 (Chinese-produced T-54) was reported destroyed, with the MGM-51 Shillelagh.
It took a very long time to address the issues of "premature detonation" of the XM409 HEAT round. And there were two types of PD failure....in-tube and just beyond the muzzle. The were repeated appeals from Combat Dev. Cmd. to not field it with HEAT. The probability of "catastrophic failure" went up exponentially with HEAT & CDC advocated that if it was fielded, a letter to the Deputy Chief of Staff-U.S. Army should be sent noting the risks to crews in fielding it. This was WITHOUT the combustible case issue.If it had the 152mm HEAT round would have dealt a death blow. At Graf one year, there were three "new" M47 hulks down range for us to fire service HEAT. By the time we rolled off the range they were nothing but piles of metallic dust.
I'm sorry I missed it, but that was at least five years after my service.TTS was great. At the time it was more mature than the sight on the LRIP M1s. Eventually the sights on the M1s and succeeding models caught up in capability.
I know what that says. It's just another indicator that the brainiacs were infatuated with missiles. But then again that crowd was always mesmerized by silver bullet solutions. MBT-70 was an example of carrying forward of the missile is all syndrome. The line leadership was so grateful we and the Germans pulled out of that mess.It took a very long time to address the issues of "premature detonation" of the XM409 HEAT round. And there were two types of PD failure....in-tube and just beyond the muzzle. The were repeated appeals from Combat Dev. Cmd. to not field it with HEAT. The probability of "catastrophic failure" went up exponentially with HEAT & CDC advocated that if it was fielded, a letter to the Deputy Chief of Staff-U.S. Army should be sent noting the risks to crews in fielding it. This was WITHOUT the combustible case issue.
The ultimate irony was that, at the same time as "two box" Sheridans were being fielded to Vietnam without missile capability, perhaps Sheridans going elsewhere (Germany) be ONLY Shillelagh-capable and no HEAT round fielded.
Think about what that says.
The reports that precipitated the near-mystic belief in guided missilery, "ARCOVE" and "Mobility, Firepower & Protection" fairly gushed with fanboy language extolling the virtues of this solution. It was also an attempt to leapfrog technology rather than the typical measure/counter-measure solutions. There was a "Manhattan Project" mentality about it.I know what that says. It's just another indicator that the brainiacs were infatuated with missiles. But then again that crowd was always mesmerized by silver bullet solutions. MBT-70 was an example of carrying forward of the missile is all syndrome. The line leadership was so grateful we and the Germans pulled out of that mess.
g
Actually, we didn't get M-60s to replace the Sheridans in Fulda, Germany, 11th ACR. It was a sad day. I loved the Sheridan, I felt like I was running knee-deep in mud in an M-60.The word "doomed" is a silly characterization. Any light-weight armored vehicle has its vulnerabilities, and even the M48 tanks in VN were knocked out. The M551 stuck around well after VN, serving until 1997.
The Sheridan was praised for its performance in Panama, and the Sheridan suffered no mechanical breakdowns in combat and performed extremely well in Desert Storm and Desert Shield in it's intended role as a Armored Reconnaissance/Airborne Assault Vehicle.
I believe I recognize the handwriting on that photo....is that you, Vic, or Mark with one of Vic's pictures? The login name also is familiar as being Mark's.The photo of the Sheridan firing a Shillelagh was taken at Yuma Proving Ground in 1965. Not Redstone. It is XM551 Pilot #12.View attachment 69175
As I suspect you may know, the Hughes LRF was my first Test Project at the Armor Board after DEROS from Vietnam. Are you the familiar "Tumbleweed" from days past?This is an M551A1. The Laser Range Finder is seen below the Cal .50 mount.View attachment 69176
Yes, it's Mark with Vic's photo. Doug?I believe I recognize the handwriting on that photo....is that you, Vic, or Mark with one of Vic's pictures? The login name also is familiar as being Mark's.
Roger that.Yes, it's Mark with Vic's photo. Doug?