testtest

Conceal Carry Reciprocity

No, states preempt laws on federal highways; see: speed limits on interstates.

There is not one set speed limit on interstates; it can change at the state line according to different to different state laws.
Hans, with all due respect, I'm pretty sure states can and sometimes do "preempt" federal hiway laws with federal approval. Without it, the feds typically withhold federal hiway funding. I guess it's a 'tit4tat kind of thing. But state law cannot supersede federal law if there is a federal law concerned. By the same token, states cannot be forced to enforce some federal law.
 
Simple, the suspect does not, and can not , has no license. Tyrone, having a rather complex history of criminal cases, doesn’t have a license. Willy, on the theft hand, had no record and getting a license, should be easy. Not saying it would happen this way, more the way I hope it would be…

Still doesn't change anything with Tyrone already packing .

And Tyrone is already inherently illegal , so nothing new is needed to bust Tyrone .
 
Still doesn't change anything with Tyrone already packing .

And Tyrone is already inherently illegal , so nothing new is needed to bust Tyrone .
Exactly, I work in law enforcement, too.
It's very common for people who are not legally allowed to possess/carry a firearm to get busted for it. Multiple times even for the same person.
As you said, it would still be illegal for them to carry even if the whole country went Constitutional Carry.
And there is no reason there should be ANY requirements for someone to legally carry
 
Exactly, I work in law enforcement, too.
It's very common for people who are not legally allowed to possess/carry a firearm to get busted for it. Multiple times even for the same person.
As you said, it would still be illegal for them to carry even if the whole country went Constitutional Carry.
And there is no reason there should be ANY requirements for someone to legally carry
Wait, what happened to "The Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?

Is Tyrone not part of "The People"?

Prior to 1968 Tyrone could have walked into a pawn shop on the way home from prison and bought a gun and he would have been legal.
 
Wait, what happened to "The Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?

Is Tyrone not part of "The People"?

Prior to 1968 Tyrone could have walked into a pawn shop on the way home from prison and bought a gun and he would have been legal.
For me, if Tyrone has served his time, he's free to legally keep and bear. I don't think a felon should lose their rights once they have served their sentence
 
Tyrone is such a tragic figure.
3L120 started the hypothetical example , just continuing the set up .

Same thing if John Doe or Frank Smith were multiple time Prohibited Person rolling thru en route to Nefarious Deeds .

Reciprocity or not ,
Con Carry or not ,

John & Frank would still be illegal , and still be same degree of difficulty to catch .
 
1732465106656.png
 
Last edited:
Why should a Constitutional “Right” be limited by state government when a “privilege” (driver’s license”) is universally honored? Makes no sense. What is each state had the “right” to accept or ignore your DL? I strongly support national CCW reciprocity and hope Congress will send a Bill to the President for his signature.
Let us take a quick look at the 1st Amendment. I can say what I want in any state (unless I am obscene or encouraging illegal activity), because it is my right (also protected by the Constitution). I do not need a license to speak. Why then with the 2nd, must I have permission from the ‘man’ to protect my life. The other nine amendments in the Bill of Rights need no further ‘permission.’ Is the 2nd Amendment a second class ammendment? No! Our country needs a serious realignment when it comes to my carrying a weapon to defend myself. It is a Federal Constitution issue, not a state’s issue. As said earlier driving is a privilege, and a state issue. My life is a right given by the LORD God! To hell with men who think otherwise!
 
I agree with the argument that CC is no different than drivers or marriage licenses.

One thing, though—one will have to be VERY aware of the use of force/carry laws if you’re in a state other than your own (I’m gonna go off the assumption that anyone with half a brain would know their own state laws…but that’s likely optimistic).

I think there’s be a few folks that think the laws in their home state—eg, no duty to retreat, mag capacity, or even type of ammo allowed (see: New Jersey)—will be universal…there would be more than a few rude awakenings, there, should nation reciprocity be made law.
I travel to Indiana from NC about once a year. Each year before I go I use the USCCA website and review changes in each states laws. Its a little bit of work but it can save you a lot of headaches.
 
I travel to Indiana from NC about once a year. Each year before I go I use the USCCA website and review changes in each states laws. Its a little bit of work but it can save you a lot of headaches.
I do the same before we head out in the camper-every time. Laws can and do change and it is Your responsibility to know what is and is Not legal where you travel.
 
i just found this on an anti-gun site, do the "facts" they say seem to hold water..???

just asking........

Myth​

Concealed carry permits should be treated just like driver’s licenses. A person licensed to drive in one state is allowed to drive in every other state, and a person legally allowed to carry a hidden, loaded handgun in one state should be allowed to do so in every other state.

Fact​

There are major differences between driver’s license laws and concealed carry laws. Driver’s license applicants are required to meet core public safety standards with little variation among states, and states voluntarily recognize each other’s driver’s licenses as a result.

But concealed carry standards vary dramatically across the country—including on safety training, disqualifying violent criminal convictions, and even the requirement to get a permit at all. Concealed Carry Reciprocity would not create a national standard for who can carry hidden, loaded handguns in public.

Instead, it would force all states to accept every other state’s standards, including those states with weaker or no standards. Every state requires a driver’s license to drive a car, but several states don’t require a permit to carry a concealed handgun in public, and many states don’t require any safety training. Forcing every state to allow these individuals to carry concealed handguns would be like forcing states to let visitors drive on their highways without a driver’s license and without having passed an eye, written, or road test.


"several states don’t require a permit to carry a concealed handgun in public, and many states don’t require any safety training. Forcing every state to allow these individuals to carry concealed handguns would be like forcing states to let visitors drive on their highways without a driver’s license and without having passed an eye, written, or road test".

The author of this piece obviously doesn't understand "Constitutional Carry". States with CC allow for concealed carry only within the boundaries of the state. If you want to travel outside the state you are required to have a CCW. The anti-gun people will read and accept without questioning the validity of the piece or the authors level of knowledge.
 
"several states don’t require a permit to carry a concealed handgun in public, and many states don’t require any safety training. Forcing every state to allow these individuals to carry concealed handguns would be like forcing states to let visitors drive on their highways without a driver’s license and without having passed an eye, written, or road test".

The author of this piece obviously doesn't understand "Constitutional Carry". States with CC allow for concealed carry only within the boundaries of the state. If you want to travel outside the state you are required to have a CCW. The anti-gun people will read and accept without questioning the validity of the piece or the authors level of knowledge.
Yes but the vast majority of CC states do not have a requirement of state citizenship. So in effect as long as you travel through only CC states, you already have reciprocity.
 
Yes but the vast majority of CC states do not have a requirement of state citizenship. So in effect as long as you travel through only CC states, you already have reciprocity. it is my understand that states with reciprocity that require a CCW do not honor "Constitutional Carry" from another state even if the state embraces Constitional caryy
Yes but the vast majority of CC states do not have a requirement of state citizenship. So in effect as long as you travel through only CC states, you already have reciprocity.
State that have reciprocity agreements with other state honor CCW as long as you follow the states laws. If you are from a state that allows constitutional carry, it is unlawful to carry in another state without a CCW. My brother-in-law lives in Indiana and carries daily in Indiana. He is planning a trip to North Carolina and can not legally carry through the states he is planning to travel through because he doesn't have a CCW. I have a CCW and travel back and forth with no legal issues. I 100% agree with others that have stated there should be reciprocity among all 50 states.
 
Back
Top