testtest

The Ultimate Nightstand Gun?

Good read on the best nightstand gun, there pick is the 1911, which is a great pick, but for me I rather have a revolver, but that’s just me.

My current “nightstand” gun is my Emissary 45 with a light on the rail, that being said since I’m still sleeping in my recliner my nightstand is my living room end table which has my Mod2 subcompact 40 on it.
 
I believe that in Illinois.The law states that if your home is broken into.It is your obligation to run from your home as fast as possible.Any attempt to confront intruders will be looked upon as a class 5 felony.
That is incorrect.
Read the whole article.
 
Currently using a Glock 31 357 sig with attached light and a Marlin 44 magnum lever action with a Vortex Venom in the corner. It's only my wife and I and 911 would be the first line of defense.
 
This article popped up in the inbox today. Thought it might add something new to the thread.

 
Yes, it will be cripplingly loud and will most likely destroy your permanent hearing. There's other very effective options available that will be less damaging to your hearing. Even the concussive blast from a short barrel 5.56 firing indoors can momentarily disorientate you.
IMHO the factor of noise is not considered nearly enough by home defenders. About the last thing you want to do is turn off one of your primary senses in a critical situation.

A suppressed gun would seem the obvious solution, but it brings its own problems to be dealt with. Better still might be a good set of electronic hearing protectors. I bought my first set in the late '80s, but for a number of reasons am looking to replace them with something better. The options are head-spinning these days. Does anyone have a good recommendation for something in the $100-$150 range?
 
This article popped up in the inbox today. Thought it might add something new to the thread.

That was the OP’s article that started this thread
 
IMHO the factor of noise is not considered nearly enough by home defenders. About the last thing you want to do is turn off one of your primary senses in a critical situation.

A suppressed gun would seem the obvious solution, but it brings its own problems to be dealt with. Better still might be a good set of electronic hearing protectors. I bought my first set in the late '80s, but for a number of reasons am looking to replace them with something better. The options are head-spinning these days. Does anyone have a good recommendation for something in the $100-$150 range?
My son's Tac team all have suppressors on the team's rifles to reduce the prospect of hearing damage should they get into a gun battle inside of a building. They did this to decrease the chance of mulitple workman comp claims that might result from severe hearing loss. Oh, and don't forget the blinding muzzle flash, and yes, suppressors do reduce that as well.
 
My nightstand gun... I do have a light for it, just not attached for this picture.

IMG_5936.JPG
 
That is incorrect.
Read the whole article.
The item about the felony charge was in jest,but having lived in the Chicago area for many years.Illinois and Chicago in particular have a bad track record when it comes to homeowners defending their home & property. At this time, I would use the present cook county state's attorney as an example.Ive seen over the years many cases of "OH" I was trying to enter the wrong house by mistake,and I was for no reason attacked.
 
The item about the felony charge was in jest,but having lived in the Chicago area for many years.Illinois and Chicago in particular have a bad track record when it comes to homeowners defending their home & property. At this time, I would use the present cook county state's attorney as an example.Ive seen over the years many cases of "OH" I was trying to enter the wrong house by mistake,and I was for no reason attacked.

Bear in mind, most states’ self defense laws have the qualifications of being in immediate threat of death or severe bodily harm…which means, with a few exceptions, the person you decide to light up has to be armed, whether they are in your home or not.

Castle doctrine doesn’t mean your domicile is a free-fire zone.
 
Lots of good ideas and opinions in this thread. The important thing is to thoroughly and realistically evaluate YOUR particular situation and come up with what works best for YOU.

Personally, I like the 1911 and the M1 Carbine for home defense duty--for MY particular situation, of course. (I have ARs and 12-ga pumps if the stuff REALLY hits the fan.)
My wife has claimed my Rock-Ola as her “closet gun”; loaded with Remington’s SP rounds, you do NOT want to be on her muzzle end.
 
Bear in mind, most states’ self defense laws have the qualifications of being in immediate threat of death or severe bodily harm…which means, with a few exceptions, the person you decide to light up has to be armed, whether they are in your home or not.

Castle doctrine doesn’t mean your domicile is a free-fire zone.
Not true. If it were there would be no need for Castle. An armed person is a threat anywhere. Castle absolutely means someone who broke into your home is assumed to be a threat. That’s the whole point.
 
This thread reminds me of this joke:

Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended.

Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
 
Back
Top